Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 12 years ago.
Improve this question
Hello friends can anyone suggest me a Net Monitor for Employees tat allows you to see screens of computers connected to the network. This way you can observe what your employees are doing! Additionally, you have the ability to take control of a remote computer by controlling the mouse and keyboard. You can record remote computers screens even when you are not monitoring them. When your employees need instructions, you can show them your desktop. To increase your efficiency the console now include several tolls that can be executed on all or just selected remote computers. When you need attention you can send a message to employees and/or lock the remote computer. Communication uses encryption. Application works through Internet, LAN, WLAN or VPN. Agent can be remotely installed.
i am runnin a traing institute with 30 Pcs which uses windows Xp and i am lookin for commercial software..
Seem like a puzzle of regular vnc software should do the job (recording comes separate, you may need r-vnc too), but vnc tends to be slow outside of LAN.
Related
Closed. This question is not about programming or software development. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 4 months ago.
Improve this question
Basically, if I'm connected to a minecraft server on computer A, then can I connect to the same server on computer B without server noiticing disconnecting on computer A and reconnecting on computer B? Back in 2020 I think there was an exploit, witch allowed to get anyones session id and join the server that they were playing on, and the game was kicking the legit player, and letting the hacker join, but now when I try to connect to a server that I'm connected to on computer A on computer B, then I get such message:
EDIT: I'm trying to join 2b2t.org on minecraft version 1.12.2 using impact cheats.
When I tried to connect from a second computer it allowed me to connect and play normally, but it logged me out from the first computer and the first computer showed the below screen.
https://i.stack.imgur.com/2oqCn.png
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 2 years ago.
Improve this question
I am having problem connecting the camera module to my Raspberry Pi 4. The PI is working just fine, but when I attach the camera to the module, it just doesn't boot.
What might be causing this?
So you have a successfully booting system then after physically connecting the camera it will not boot?
First, double check the camera is connected properly. Meaning the blue side of the connections are facing the right way (i.e. blue side facing the USB ports on the RPi itself and facing the front of the camera on the camera module connection). A quick search found this post containing pictures, that is usually the issue. If that fails, consider options within the config.txt file on the /boot partition. Reference for config.txt.
One of the config options that gets added automatically when adding the camera interface via raspi-config is start_x=1 Camera entries within config.txt are described here. Be sure that you have enough memory configured (i.e. gpu_mem=128, though increasing that is probably a good idea if you're doing a lot with the GPU (motion detection, etc.). But the physical connection is most likely the culprit.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
I'd like to capture the traffic sent by a Sonos speaker (to troubleshoot streaming issues).
I've found one way to do this but it's a bit cumbersome: I plug the Sonos speaker via an ethernet to usb adapter to my PC, share the PC connection and then capture on that interface.
It's limited to one speaker and if the speaker has ever been configured to use the WiFi, it seems that it uses WiFi even plugged that way (and I don't capture anything).
What's the detailed setup to use port mirorring to do this? I'd like to compare the two solutions and don't know much about port mirorring setup.
Thanks!
I would recommend getting yourself a network hub to plug Sonos and the computer into and capture from that.
Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 10 years ago.
Improve this question
I planning to run a private media wiki server on debian(SELinux) for all my important home documents.
I would like to be able to securely access it from the outside with laptop, tablet, or even a live-CD like LPS. It seems to me I would have the smallest attack surface if I only provided SSH to the cloud and tunneled in, maybe even incorporate a port knock to prevent casual detection. I will be serving content to a known and essentially unchanging set of users. Bandwidth efficiency isn't really a factor as concurrent connections would be rare.
Is there a more secure way to access a web server? It seems the government really likes to use smart cards although I'm not sure how. What about client side browser certificates? Yubikey?
The safest solution is probably using a virtual private network so that the server cannot be contacted at all except through an SSH-like protocol. A decent router should support this; you can get more help over at SuperUser.
Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
The company I work with currently has 10 windows boxes running various in house scripts, however occasionally one goes down and no one notices for periods of up to 24 hours because the data that is manufactured is only gathered on weekly intervals. Does anyone know of a management system that will notify when a box goes down and possibly shoot uptime and response statistics back to a web management system on a linux box?
There are many.
I use Nagios for monitoring Windows and Linux servers. You might also look into Zenoss. Both are open source.
http://www.pingdom.com/ is simple to use and you get a 30 day trial - 9.95 a month gets you a lot if you decide to sign on. have it for all my apps
I would have a bash script call ping on the machines and email me (or whomever is responsible) when a box goes down.
I've seen IPMonitor in use, and it is a very good tool (but expensive). Nagios is a free alternative, and it's supposed to be quite good, but I've never used it myself.
I know nmap has a way of showing you the machine's uptime when you use the OS fingerprinting option.