We're having problems when trying to deploy a number of projects which use zc.buildout - specifically we're finding that they want to put their PYTHON_EGG_CACHE directories all over the show. We'd like to somehow set this directory to one at the same level as the built-out project, where eggs can be found.
There is some mention online that this can be done for Plone projects, but is it possible to do this without Plone?
Are there some recipes that can set up an environment variable so we can set the PYTHON_EGG_CACHE executable files in ./bin?
The PYTHON_EGG_CACHE is only used for zipped eggs, your best bet is to have zc.buildout install all required eggs unzipped:
[buildout]
...
unzip = true
If your system python has zipped eggs installed that still require unzipping for resource access, and setting the PYTHON_EGG_CACHE in your scripts is your only option (as opposed to setting the environment variable for your user), you could try to use the initialization option of zc.recipe.egg to add arbitrary Python code to your scripts:
[a-part]
recipe = zc.recipe.egg
...
initialization =
import os
os.environ['PYTHON_EGG_CACHE'] = '/tmp/python_eggs'
I'm not sure what you mean. Three options that you normally have:
Buildout, by default, stores the eggs in a directory called eggs/ inside your buildout directory.
You can set the eggs-dir variable inside your buildout.cfg's [buildout] section to some directory. Just tell it where to place them.
You can also set that very same option in .buildout/defaults.cfg inside your home directory. That way you can set a default for all your projects. Handy for storing all your eggs in one place: that can save a lot of download time, for instance.
Does one of those (especially the last one) accomplish what you want?
And: don't muck around with eggs in the generated bin/* files. Let buldout pick the eggs, that's its purpose.
Related
According to Apple's Developer Docs the Library global allows one to import compiled scripts so they can be used as a library in one's current script. This works just fine if you were to do something like the below code with myLibName.scpt located at ~/Library/Script Libraries:
myLib = Library('myLibName');
myLib.myLibMethod() // Works just fine
But, the docs also claim that one can export an environment variable — OSA_LIBRARY_PATH containing a string of : delimited paths — and Library() would then defer to that list of paths before proceeding to it's default path: ~/Library/Script Libraries. Ya know, like the bash environment variable Path. Here's the relevant piece of documentation below; it describes the path hierarchy:
The basic requirement for a script to be a script
library is its location: it must be a script document in a “Script
Libraries” folder in one of the following folders. When searching for
a library, the locations are searched in the order listed, and the
first matching script is used:
If the script that references the library is a bundle, the script’s
bundle Resources directory. This means that scripts may be packaged
and distributed with the libraries they use.
If the application running the script is a bundle, the application’s bundle Resources
directory. This means that script applications (“applets” and
“droplets”) may be packaged and distributed with the libraries they
use. It also enables applications that run scripts to provide
libraries for use by those scripts.
Any folders specified in the environment variable OSA_LIBRARY_PATH. This allows using a library
without installing it in one of the usual locations. The value of this
variable is a colon-separated list of paths, such as /opt/local/Script
Libraries:/usr/local/Script Libraries. Unlike the other library
locations, paths specified in OSA_LIBRARY_PATH are used exactly as-is,
without appending “Script Libraries”. Supported in OS X v10.11 and
later.
The Library folder in the user’s home directory, ~/Library.
This is the location to install libraries for use by a single user,
and is the recommended location during library development.
The
computer Library folder, /Library. Libraries located here are
available to all users of the computer.
The network Library folder,
/Network/Library. Libraries located here are available to multiple
computers on a network.
The system Library folder, /System/Library.
These are libraries provided by OS X.
Any installed application
bundle, in the application’s bundle Library directory. This allows
distributing libraries that are associated with an application, or
creating applications that exist solely to distribute libraries.
Supported in OS X v10.11 and later.
The problem is that it doesn't work. I've tried exporting the OSA_LIBRARY_PATH variable — globally via my .zshrc file — and then running a sample script just like the one above via both the Script Editor and the osascript executable. Nothing works; I get a "file not found" error. I found this thread-where-the-participants-give-up-hope online; it doesn't explain much. Any thoughts?
On a somewhat related note, the Scripting Additions suite provides two other methods — loadScript and storeScript — that seem like they might be useful here. Unfortunately, when you try to use them, osascript gives you the finger. Though, I did manage to return what looked like a hexadecimal buffer from a compiled script using loadScript. Anyway, any insight you guys can shed on this would be much appreciated. Thanks.
The OSA_LIBRARY_PATH environment variable is ignored by restricted executables when running with System Integrity Protection enabled.
To workaround this limitation you can either turn off SIP, or you can use an unrestricted executable.
For instance, to make osascript unrestricted, you should first make a copy, and then re-sign it with an ad-hoc signature:
cp /usr/bin/osascript ./osascript
codesign -f -s - ./osascript
Once you have the unrestricted osascript, you can run it with the OSA_LIBRARY_PATH environment variable set like this:
OSA_LIBRARY_PATH="/path/to/libs" ./osascript path/to/script.scpt
As a lousy alternative, you can put a symlink at one of the "Script Libraries" folders that osascript would look at and point it to the folder you want. Note that the symlink must be a replacement for the entire folder, it can't just exist inside of it.
rm -rf ~/Library/Script\ Libraries
ln -s "/Your/Custom/Path/Goes/Here/" ~/Library/Script\ Libraries
Tested on 10.13.2
I have a c++ command line application that I have already compiled into an executable and have added it into my Xcode project. I have also added the "Copy Files" section to the Build Phases tab of the project properties and added my executable with the "Executables" destination. When I build my application I see it in the test.app/Contents/MacOS folder when I View package contents on the test.app that is built.
I also have App Sandbox enabled on the Capabilities tab of the project (so that I can distribute my application through the mac app store.
How can I expose this command line executable that is bundled with my application to the user so that they can run it from the command line (terminal)? I have not been able to find anything on search engines or on StackOverflow about how to get this file (or a symlink to this file) into the users PATH. I tried using an NSTask to create a symlink, but that only works if I disable the App Sandbox (which makes sense). Has anyone done this before? How did you get it to work? Or can these executables only be executed by code within your application?
I don't see a good way to do this. First, a clarification: the PATH is a list of directories that contain executables, not a list of executables; there's no way to add a single executable to the PATH. Instead, what you'd need to do is either put your executable into one of the directories in the user's PATH, or add the directory your executable is in into the PATH.
On OS X, the default PATH is /usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/usr/local/bin. The first 4 directories shouldn't be modified from the system default, so only /usr/local/bin is a possibility. But creating it (it doesn't exist by default) would require admin (actually root) rights, which isn't allowed by App Store policies. So that's out.
That leaves modifying the user's PATH. The "right" way to do that system-wide is by placing a file in /etc/paths.d, which requires admin (/root) rights, so that's out too. Technically modifying the /etc/paths file would work, but that has the same permissions problem plus it's the wrong way to do customization.
The next possibility is to modify (/create) the user's shell initialization script(s). This'll work, but doing it at all right is going to be messy, because there are several shells the user might use, each with several different possible initialization scripts that the user might or might not have created...
Let's take a very simple case: a user who only ever uses bash, and who doesn't already have any initialization scripts. When a "login" instance of bash starts, it looks for ~/.bash_profile, ~/.bash_login, and ~/.profile (in that order), and runs the first one it finds. But your app doesn't know which shell he uses, so you'd better create ~/.profile so zsh and ksh will use it as well. So, your app creates ~/.profile, and puts this in it:
PATH="$PATH:/Applications/MyApp.app/Contents/Helpers"
Great, right? Yup, great, until the user runs something else that wants to set their PATH, it creates ~/.bash_profile, and this overrides your setup. After that, your executable will be in the PATH of zsh and ksh, but not bash. Whee.
And then one day the user decides to use tcsh instead, and it (and csh) have a completely different but equally messy pile of possible init files...
Is it possible to have Zope2 buildout unpack python files into their normal directories like how standard python modules do, and not under separate .egg directories? It makes looking for files easier when debugging.
The 'regular' setup doesn't support namespaced packages very well, where multiple eggs share a top-level name (such as plone.app and zope, etc.)
Use the collective.recipe.omelette buildout recipe to build a 'regular' setup, it uses symlinks to give you a searchable structure of all eggs used.
[buildout]
parts =
omelette
...
[omelette]
recipe = collective.recipe.omelette
eggs = ${instance:eggs}
You'll find the result in parts/omelette. Note that this structure uses symlinks, so if you use tools like find or ack make sure to configure them to follow symlinks (e.g. find parts/omelette -L and ack --follow).
The omelette directory structure is not used by Python itself, it is purely intended for presenting a coherent library structure from all eggs used in your buildout.
Note that for Windows, you need to install the junction utility as well for the recipe to work.
I'm having an issue with linked Resources in Flash Builder. I work in a team environment where we use Linked Resources extensively. We just started developing ANEs and noticed that while linkedResources are used in the libraryPathEntry, in the buildTargets like anePathEntry and airCertificatePath, the absolute path is stored. I tried editing the .actionScriptProperties files directly, modifying the buildtarget absolute paths to linked resource equivalents using the libraryPathEntry as a guide but FlashBuilder complained when loading the project.
Is there a way to get the buildTargets to respect linkedResources and not save the absolute path? I'm trying to avoid the draconian way where all developers must have the exact same directory structure.
Thanks!
Randy
My team had this exact problem and all attempts to fix it with relative paths or workspace macros (i.e. ${PROJECT_LOC}) failed. It seems as if the team in charge of Flash Builder neglected to support relative paths in these particular dialogs, despite them being supported elsewhere.
Here is what we have done to fix this problem. I am assuming you are on a Mac/Linux or the like. If not, the concept here can still be applied.
Most of our projects already have a "set up" bash script that contributors run when they get code. Inside of that script, we simply set up a couple of symbolic links from the user specific absolute path, to a new absolute path with a "common" user. The script first creates the directory if it does not exist, and then creates the symlinks.
sudo mkdir -p /Users/common/<project>/
sudo ln -f -h -s ~/path/to/certificate/dir /Users/common/<project>/certificates
Obviously you can use whatever you like and whatever makes sense for the common path.
Now, in your .actionScriptProperties file you can change the location pointed to by the provisingFile and airCertificatePath to this new common absolute path.
<buildTarget ... provisioningFile="/Users/common/<project>/certificates/provisionfile.mobileprovision" ... >
<airSettings airCertificatePath="/Users/common/<project>/certificates/cert.p12" ... >
We actually take this a step further (and I suspect you will need to also) and create common symlink paths for the ANE files themselves. This ends up changing the anePathEntry to the common path as well.
<anePathEntry path="/Users/common/<project>/anes/some.ane"/>
You will need to make sure that you either hand edit the .actionScriptProperties file directly, or type in the fully qualified symlink path into the dialogs directly. Any attempt at using the Finder dialog launched by Flash Builder to navigate to the files in the common location resulted in the symlinks being auto-resolved to their actual locations.
The script requires sudo, which as I'm sure you know, will require that the users of it know their root password. Maybe some more bash savvy folks can suggest a way around sudo if this is not an option for you.
This will work for android stuff as well I believe. I don't know if that matters to you or not.
Hope this helps!
It looks like this issue was called out in the Flash Builder 4.6 known issues:
http://helpx.adobe.com/flash-builder/kb/flash-builder-4-6-known.html
https://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FB-32955
The bug is apparently fixed but I haven't been able to check the new Flash Builder 4.7 beta yet:
http://blogs.adobe.com/flex/2012/08/flash-builder-4-7-beta-is-here.html
We are trying to setup stylecop for a team development environment. So far what we have done is:
Checked the files into source control
Create an environment variable on every machine that points to that location (each dev has source checked out to a different location, this solves that)
Add the tag to the project as follows:
This works great, but VS complains that the file is unsafe, and I know to fix that we have to mark is safe in the registry. We wanted to create a .reg file to import this setting and make it easier for everyone. Can we use that environment variable in the path? I have tried the snippet below, but that doesn't seem to work. Is the syntax for an environment variable different?
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\VisualStudio\9.0\MSBuild\SafeImports]
"StyleCop.4.3"="%StyleCopLocation%\\Microsoft.StyleCop.Targets"
Why you need to host that Targets file in a global place? Everyone can install a copy of StyleCop.
If you in fact plan to share StyleCop settings, please configure the projects to use a project locally setting file (*.SourceAnalysis). You can check in this file along with your projects, and then everyone is in sync.