I am working on a remote database which has several master tables. the meta-data & the actual data in these tables changes rarely.
When querying DB involving these tables and using certain functions (Ex: ctrl+space to auto-complete a table/column name), it takes too long to query the remote DB to fetch this data since its not cached locally.
Is there any extension/plug-in/configuration in SQLDeveloper to do this.
(Oracle SQLDeveloper Version 1.5.1 Build MAIN-5440)
Try to update to version 2.1
Use a tool like SQuirreL to build your queries and then copy them into SQLDeveloper. SQuirreL caches the metadata.
You could create a view on the local DB, that would keep the metadata local.
Related
I have a need to frequently run a large-ish query against a remote Oracle DB, which with my link speed, takes 10+ minutes. Is there a technique that I can use to create a local copy of the data in order to improve performance?
A few notes:
I would just need a local copy of a predetermined set of tables
Being able to schedule an update to run nightly would be a huge bonus
The data generally doesn't need to be refreshed throughout the day, though being able to do a delta update would be nice
I do have remote machines that can access the data much quicker, but I'm not able to install Excel on them to perform the actual work that needs to be done (using SQL Developer is not a problem). But it would be possible to set up an auto download of the data on those machines and then create a task to copy the files to my local machine
I've considered a few ideas so far, such as configuring SQL Developer to automatically pull the data that I need and dump it to Excel (or some other format that I can use to pull the data in from another Excel file), but I thought there might be a better way.
One way is to use the expdp and impdp tools to dump (export) only a subset of the tables :
https://oracle-base.com/articles/10g/oracle-data-pump-10g
But this solution could be quite hard to implement since you must have the tools on your local server and an access to the remote server to launch the export.
I think the simplest solution it to use CTAS (Create Table As Select). This will make a copy of the data from the distant server to you local server. For example if you use a database link called DistantServer, issue on you local server :
DROP TABLE MyTable;
CREATE TABLE MyTable AS SELECT * FROM MyTable#DistantServer;
You can search for Oracle CTAS for more informations.
Then if the CTAS script is correct you can schedule it every night by creating a Oracle JOB on you local server. See DBMS_JOB for older release of Oracle RDBMS or better DBMS_SCHEDULER package.
We are trying to create a cross-database query using Azure's preview Elastic Query. So we will be creating an External Table to make these queries happen.
Unfortunately, I have some apprehension about how the queries will be executed. I don't want a query or stored procedure to fail at run-time because the database connection fails. I just don't understand how the External Tables work.
Azure's External Table docs have good information on how to query and create the table. I just can't find information that specifically spells out how the data exists.
Oracle's version of external tables is just flat files that are referenced. SQL*Loader loads data from external files into tables of an Oracle database. I couldn't find any documentation about Azure doing the same. (Is it implied that they are the same? Is that a stupid question?)
If it is this way (external flat files), when the external table gets updated, does SQL Server update the flat files so our external table stays up to date? Or will I have to delete/create the link again every time I want to run the query for up to date information?
Per Microsoft Support:
Elastic queries basically works as remote queries which means the data is not stored locally but is pulled from the source database every time you run a query. When you execute a query on an external table, it makes a connection to the source database and gets the data.
With that being said, you do not have to delete/create the links. Once you have performed these steps, you can access the horizontally partitioned table “mytable” as though it were a local table. Azure SQL Database automatically opens multiple parallel connections to the remote databases where the tables are physically stored, processes the requests on the remote databases, and returns the results.
There is no specific risk associated with using this feature but it is simply like opening connections to the source database so it can pull data. Besides this you can expect some slowness when executing a remote query but nothing that will cause any other issues with the database.
In case any of the database becomes unavailable, queries that are using the affected DB as source or target will experience query cancellations or timeouts.
I have several large SQL queries that I need to run against a Postgres data source. I am using SSIS on SQL Server 2008 R2 to move the data. Because of the way our system is set up, I have to use a tunnel via PuTTY and set up local port redirection.
In the SSIS package, I am using ADO.NET source and destination. I have PostgreSQL drivers installed, and we were able to get the 32-bit version working. My package runs, I am getting the data, but the data transformation tasks run painfully slow ... about 2,000 records per second.
Does anyone have experience making a trip to Postgres with static queries and dumping the results into a SQL Server? Any tips / best practices?
You should try to get the data and store it in a ssis raw file.
Then make your transformation and whatever you like on the raw file data.
After that send it back to DB.
General try not to have many calls to the database.
I use Mac and PostgreSQL is the choice for db management. I can not install MSSQL. There's a db which is created and managed by MSSQL.
I must not copy the entire data via a script, to my database (because of using real time data)
My only option is, connecting that MSSQL created db with PostgreSQL.
Is it possible? If yes, how? Will there be any relevant limitations for my queries?
Thanks.
Additional details:
I'll make selections, calculations, statistically.
I won't modify the existing data.
The feature, which allows you to connect to a different database from within PostgreSQL itself, is called foreign data wrapper.
Here, there is a list of available foreign data wrappers, but mssql is not included. But ODBC is, so (in theory) if you install odbc_fdw, you can access foreign mssql tables in your PostgreSQL instance.
There is also a tds_fdw for SQL Server which uses FreeTDS for the connection rather than ODBC
I am writing code to migrate data from our live Access database to a new Sql Server database which has a different schema with a reorganized structure. This Sql Server database will be used with a new version of our application in development.
I've been writing migrating code in C# that calls Sql Server and Access and transforms the data as required. I migrated for the first time a table which has entries related to new entries of another table that I have not updated recently, and that caused an error because the record in the corresponding table in SQL Server could not be found
So, my SqlServer productions table has data only up to 1/14/09, and I'm continuing to migrate more tables from Access. So I want to write an update method that can figure out what the new stuff is in Access that hasn't been reflected in Sql Server.
My current idea is to write a query on the SQL side which does SELECT Max(RunDate) FROM ProductionRuns, to give me the latest date in that field in the table. On the Access side, I would write a query that does SELECT * FROM ProductionRuns WHERE RunDate > ?, where the parameter is that max date found in SQL Server, and perform my translation step in code, and then insert the new data in Sql Server.
What I'm wondering is, do I have the syntax right for getting the latest date in that Sql Server table? And is there a better way to do this kind of migration of a live database?
Edit: What I've done is make a copy of the current live database. Which I can then migrate without worrying about changes, then use that to test during development, and then I can migrate the latest data whenever the new database and application go live.
I personally would divide the process into two steps.
I would create an exact copy of Access DB in SQLServer and copy all the data
Copy the data from this temporary SQLServer DB to your destination database
In that way you can write set of SQL code to accomplish second step task
Alternatively use SSIS
Generally when you convert data to a new database that will take it's place in porduction, you shut out all users of the database for a period of time, run the migration and turn on the new database. This ensures no changes to the data are made while doing the conversion. Of course I never would have done this using c# either. Data migration is a database task and should have been done in SSIS (or DTS if you have an older version of SQL Server).
If the databse you are converting to is just in development, I would create a backup of the Access database and load the data from there to test the data loading process and to get the data in so you can do the application development. Then when it is time to do the real load, you just close down the real database to users and use it to load from. If you are trying to keep both in synch wile you develop, well I wouldn't do that but if you must, make a nightly backup of the file and load first thing in the morning using your process.
You may want to look at investing in a tool like SQL Data Compare.
I believe it has support for access databases too, and you can download a trial.
I you are happy with you C# code, but it fails because of the constraints in your destination database you temporarily can disable them and then enable after you copy the whole lot.
I am assuming that your destination database is brand new DB with no data, and not used by anyone when the transfer happens
It sounds like you have two problems:
You're migrating data from one database to another.
You're changing your schema.
Doing either of these things is tricky if you are trying to migrate the data while people are using the data.
The simplest approach is to migrate the data based on a static copy of the data, and also to queue updates to that data from the moment you captured the static copy. I don't know how easy this is in Access, but in SQLServer or Oracle you can use the redo logs for this or a manual solution using triggers. The poor-man's way of doing this is to make triggers for all the relevant tables that log the primary key of the records that have changed. Then after the old database is shut off you can iterate over those keys and get those records from the old database and put them into the new database. Just copy the whole record; if the record was deleted then delete it from the new database.
Your problem is compounded by the fact that you can't simply copy the data, you have to transform it. This means you probably have to shut down both databases and re-migrate the records based on the change list. It will take a lot of planning to ensure you get things right and I'd recommend writing a testing script that can validate that the resulting data is correct.
Also I'd ensure that the code for the migration runs inside one of the databases if possible. Otherwise you are copying the data twice and this will significantly harm the performance.