JScript.NET private variables - variables

I'm wondering about JScript.NET private variables. Please take a look on the following code:
import System;
import System.Windows.Forms;
import System.Drawing;
var jsPDF = function(){
var state = 0;
var beginPage = function(){
state = 2;
out('beginPage');
}
var out = function(text){
if(state == 2){
var st = 3;
}
MessageBox.Show(text + ' ' + state);
}
var addHeader = function(){
out('header');
}
return {
endDocument: function(){
state = 1;
addHeader();
out('endDocument');
},
beginDocument: function(){
beginPage();
}
}
}
var j = new jsPDF();
j.beginDocument();
j.endDocument();
Output:
beginPage 2
header 2
endDocument 2
if I run the same script in any browser, the output is:
beginPage 2
header 1
endDocument 1
Why it is so??
Thanks,
Paul.

Just a guess, but it appears that JScript.NET doesn't support closures the same way as EMCAScript, so the state variable in endDocument() isn't referencing the private member of the outer function, but rather an local variable (undeclared). Odd.

You don't have to use new when calling jsPDF here since you're using a singleton pattern. jsPDF is returning an object literal so even without new you'll have access to the beginPage and endDocument methods. To be perfectly honest I don't know what the specifications call for when using new on a function that returns an object literal so I'm not sure if JScript.NET is getting it wrong or the browser. But for now try either getting rid of the new before jsPDF() or change your function to this:
var jsPDF = function(){
var state = 0;
var beginPage = function(){
state = 2;
out('beginPage');
};
var out = function(text){
if(state == 2){
var st = 3;
}
MessageBox.Show(text + ' ' + state);
};
var addHeader = function(){
out('header');
};
this.endDocument = function(){
state = 1;
addHeader();
out('endDocument');
};
this.beginDocument: function(){
beginPage();
};
}
That will allow you to use the new keyword and create more than one jsPDF object.

I've come across the same problem. In the following code, the closure bound to fun should contain only one variable called result. As the code stands, the variable result in the function with one parameter seems to be different to the result variable in the closure.
If in this function the line
result = [];
is removed, then the result in the line
return result;
refers to the result in the closure.
var fun = function() {
var result = [];
// recursive descent, collects property names of obj
// dummy parameter does nothing
var funAux = function(obj, pathToObj, dummy) {
if (typeof obj === "object") {
for (var propName in obj) {
if (obj.hasOwnProperty(propName)) {
funAux(obj[propName], pathToObj.concat(propName), dummy);
}
}
}
else {
// at leaf property, save path to leaf
result.push(pathToObj);
}
}
return function(obj) {
// remove line below and `result' 3 lines below is `result' in closure
result = []; // does not appear to be bound to `result' above
funAux(obj, [], "dummy");
return result; // if result 2 lines above is set, result is closure is a different variable
};
}();

Related

Photoshop Scripting: Relink Smart Object

I'm working on a script that should go through a photoshop document and relink all visible linked objects to a new specified file. I've gotten the loop working so that it cycles through every layer and collects only the visible layers, but for the life of me I can't find if there's a method available to relink a smart object. The closest I've found is this script:
https://gist.github.com/laryn/0a1f6bf0dab5b713395a835f9bfa805c
but when it gets to desc3.putPath(idnull, new File(newFile));, it spits out an error indicating that the functionality may not be present in the current Photoshop version. The script itself is 4 years old so it may be out of date.
Any help would be appreciated!
MY script as it stands is below:
// SELECT FILE //
var files = File.openDialog("Please select new linked file");
var selectedFile = files[0];
// GET ALL LAYERS //
var doc = app.activeDocument;
var allLayers = [];
var allLayers = collectAllLayers(doc, allLayers);
function collectAllLayers (doc, allLayers)
{
for (var m = 0; m < doc.layers.length; m++)
{
var theLayer = doc.layers[m];
if (theLayer.typename === "ArtLayer")
{
allLayers.push(theLayer);
}
else
{
collectAllLayers(theLayer, allLayers);
}
}
return allLayers;
}
// GET VISIBLE LAYERS //
var visibleLayers = [];
for (i = 0; i < allLayers.length; i++)
{
var layer = allLayers[i];
if (layer.visible && layer.kind == LayerKind.SMARTOBJECT)
{
visibleLayers.push(layer);
}
}
// REPLACE LAYERS
for (i = 0; i < visibleLayers.length; i++)
{
var layer = visibleLayers[i];
//--> REPLACE THE FILE HERE
}
Note: I am aware that this script currently may be error-prone if you don't know exactly how it works; I'm not intending to publish it at this time so I'm not super concerned with that at the moment. Mostly I just need the core functionality to work.
I used an AM function for getting visible smart objects — it works much faster. But if you want you can use yours. The important bit is relinkSO(path);: it'll also work in your script (just don't forget to select a layer: activeDocument.activeLayer = visibleLayers[i];)
Note that it works similar to Photoshop Relink to File command — if used on one instance of Smart Object all the instances are going to be relinked. If you want to relink only specific layers you'll have to break instancing first (probably using the New Smart Object via Copy command)
function main() {
var myFile = Folder.myDocuments.openDlg('Load file', undefined, false);
if (myFile == null) return false;
// gets IDs of all smart objects
var lyrs = getLyrs();
for (var i = 0; i < lyrs.length; i++) {
// for each SO id...
// select it
selectById(lyrs[i]);
// relink SO to file
relinkSO(myFile);
// embed linked if you want
embedLinked()
}
function getLyrs() {
var ids = [];
var layers, desc, vis, type, id;
try
{
activeDocument.backgroundLayer;
layers = 0;
}
catch (e)
{
layers = 1;
}
while (true)
{
ref = new ActionReference();
ref.putIndex(charIDToTypeID('Lyr '), layers);
try
{
desc = executeActionGet(ref);
}
catch (err)
{
break;
}
vis = desc.getBoolean(charIDToTypeID("Vsbl"));
type = desc.getInteger(stringIDToTypeID("layerKind"));
id = desc.getInteger(stringIDToTypeID("layerID"));
if (type == 5 && vis) ids.push(id);
layers++;
}
return ids;
} // end of getLyrs()
function selectById(id) {
var desc = new ActionDescriptor();
var ref = new ActionReference();
ref.putIdentifier(charIDToTypeID('Lyr '), id);
desc.putReference(charIDToTypeID('null'), ref);
executeAction(charIDToTypeID('slct'), desc, DialogModes.NO);
} // end of selectById()
function relinkSO(path) {
var desc = new ActionDescriptor();
desc.putPath( charIDToTypeID('null'), new File( path ) );
executeAction( stringIDToTypeID('placedLayerRelinkToFile'), desc, DialogModes.NO );
} // end of relinkSO()
function embedLinked() {
executeAction( stringIDToTypeID('placedLayerConvertToEmbedded'), undefined, DialogModes.NO );
} // end of embedLinked()
}
app.activeDocument.suspendHistory("relink SOs", "main()");

Run last Photoshop script (again)

This seems like a trivial issue but I'm not sure Photoshop supports this type of functionality:
Is it possible to implement use last script functionality?
That is without having to add a function on each and every script that writes it's filename to a text file.
Well... It's a bit klunky, but I suppose you could read in the scriptlistener in reverse order and find the first mention of a script file:
// Switch off any dialog boxes
displayDialogs = DialogModes.NO; // OFF
var scripts_folder = "D:\\PS_scripts";
var js = "C:\\Users\\GhoulFool\\Desktop\\ScriptingListenerJS.log";
var jsLog = read_file(js);
var lastScript = process_file(jsLog);
// use function to call scripts
callScript(lastScript)
// Set Display Dialogs back to normal
displayDialogs = DialogModes.ALL; // NORMAL
function callScript (ascript)
{
eval('//#include "' + ascript + '";\r');
}
function process_file(afile)
{
var needle = ".jsx";
var msg = "";
// Let's do this backwards
for (var i = afile.length-1; i>=0; i--)
{
var str = afile[i];
if(str.indexOf(needle) > 0)
{
var regEx = str.replace(/(.+new\sFile\(\s")(.+\.jsx)(.+)/gim, "$2");
if (regEx != null)
{
return regEx;
}
}
}
}
function read_file(inFile)
{
var theFile = new File(inFile);
//read in file
var lines = new Array();
var l = 0;
var txtFile = new File(theFile);
txtFile.open('r');
var str = "";
while(!txtFile.eof)
{
var line = txtFile.readln();
if (line != null && line.length >0)
{
lines[l++] = line;
}
}
txtFile.close();
return lines;
}

remove ticker for individual object in createjs

I want to remove the listener for individual objects that are animating. I want to remove the ticker for individual objects because they will stop at different times when they reach 200px in y. This code is one frame in Adobe Animate. So this code is not working:
this.stop();
that= this;
var aParticle;
var mySpeed = 12;
var myRotation = 4;
var totalParticles = 5;
var stopParticles = false;
var particleHolder = new createjs.Container();
var count = 0;
var collission_ar = [this.parent.mc_coll0, this.parent.mc_coll1, `this.parent.mc_coll2, this.parent.mc_coll3, this.parent.mc_coll4, this.parent.mc_coll5, this.parent.mc_coll6, this.parent.mc_coll7, this.parent.mc_coll8, this.parent.mc_coll9, this.parent.mc_coll10, this.parent.mc_coll11, this.parent.mc_coll12, this.parent.mc_coll13, this.parent.mc_coll14];`
var totalCollisions = collission_ar.length;
this.addChild(particleHolder);
//stage.update();
var xRange = width;
var yRange = height;
var scaleNum = 1;
//var collisionMethod = ndgmr.checkPixelCollision;
this.scaleX = 1;
this.scaleY = 1;
createParticles()
setTimeout(function(){
removeTimer();
}, 5000)
function createParticles(){
var particle_ar = [];
var randNum = Math.ceil(Math.random() * totalParticles);
aParticle = new lib['MC_leaf'+randNum]();
aParticle.name = 'MC_leaf'+count;
aParticle.x = Math.random() * xRange;
aParticle.y = -Math.random() * 15;
theNum = Math.random() * scaleNum;
aParticle.scaleX = theNum
aParticle.scaleY = theNum
aParticle.alpha = 1;
aParticle.collision = Math.floor(Math.random() * 2);
particleHolder.addChild(aParticle);
aParticle.addEventListener("tick", animateParticle.bind(that));
if(!stopParticles){
timer = setTimeout(function() { createParticles() }, 100);
}
count++;
}
function animateParticle (event){
var part = event.currentTarget;
event.currentTarget.y += mySpeed
event.currentTarget.x += Math.random()/10
event.currentTarget.rotation += myRotation;
if (part.y > 200) {
if(part.name == 'MC_leaf0') console.log('part0 y '+part.y);
part.removeEventListener("tick", animateParticle.bind(that));
}
}
function removeTimer() {
stopParticles = true;
timer = clearInterval();
}
var timer = setTimeout(function() { createParticles() }, 100, that);
So this code is just ignored:
part.removeEventListener("tick", animateParticle.bind(that));
You must pass a reference to the same method in removeEventListener that you used with addEventListener. When you use bind, it generates a wrapper function each time.
// This won't work.
part.removeEventListener("tick", animateParticle.bind(that));
A simple workaround is to store a reference to the bound function, and use that.
aParticle.tickHandler = animateParticle.bind(that);
aParticle.addEventListener("tick", aParticle.tickHandler);
Then use it when removing the listener
part.removeEventListener("tick", part.tickHandler);
There is a better way to handle this though. If you use the utility on() method instead of addEventListener, you can easily remove the method inside the handler.
aParticle.on("tick", animateParticle, that);
// Then when removing:
function animateParticle(event) {
if (conditions) {
event.remove();
}
}
The on() method also has a scope parameter, so you can skip the function binding. It is important to note though that the on() method does its own internal binding, so to remove a listener the usual way, you have to store a reference to it as well.
var listener = target.on("tick", handler, this);
listener.off("tick", listener);
Hope that helps!

Pure javascript pixel manipulation with processing.js

I would like to manipulate pixels with processing.js. I would like to do this in pure javascript but am having difficulties. The following simple case fails
<canvas id="canvas1"></canvas>
<script type="text/javascript">
function sketchProc(p){
// Configure page and init variables
function setup() {
p.size(300, 300);
console.log(p.pixels)
p.background(100,200,100)
}
function draw() {
p.loadPixels();
for (var i = 0; i < 3000 ; i++) {
p.pixels[i] = p.color(0,0,0)
}
p.updatePixels();
}
// Attach functions to processing object
p.setup = setup;
p.draw = draw;
}
var canvas = document.getElementById("canvas1")
var processingInstance = new Processing(canvas, sketchProc)
</script>
which (I believe) should convert the first 3000 pixels to black. Looking at the console.log for p.pixels I am wondering if this type of array access fails in pure javascript? Any suggestions welcome and thanks in advance.
That is because you must Attach the functions directly to p:
function sketchProc(p){
// Attach functions to processing object
p.setup = function setup() {
p.size(300, 300);
console.log(p.pixels);
p.background(100,200,100);
};
p.draw = function draw() {
p.loadPixels();
for (var i = 0; i < 3000 ; i++) {
p.pixels[i] = p.color(0,0,0);
}
p.updatePixels();
};
}
var canvas = document.getElementById("canvas1");
var processingInstance = new Processing(canvas, sketchProc);

Dojo scope question for store.query with ItemFileWriteStore

I am writing a method to grab the lowest unique id in an ItemFileWriteStore. I have a boolean to tell me when I reach my condition, but I can't get the scope correct.
The function call works as I expect, apart from when newIdOkay is set to true, it is not recognised in the while loop.
Please can you explain why and what I have to do to get this right?
Many thanks
Here is my code:
function checkNewId( size ) {
if( size == 0 ) {
console.log('found new ID!');
newIdOkay = true;
}
}
function addContentItem( store ) {
// New ID
var newIdOkay = false;
var newId = 0;
while( newIdOkay == false && newId < 8 ) {
newId++;
store.fetch({ query: {id:newId}, onBegin: dojo.hitch(this, "checkNewId"),
start:0, count:0, sync:true });
}
}
To understand the reason, you need to have basic understanding of identifier resolution and scope chain in JavaScript. I recommend you to read this article: http://jibbering.com/faq/notes/closures/
Regarding you question, in the function addContentItem, the check in the while loop is tested against the identifier newIdOkay which is in the of the activation object corresponding to this function execution context. In the function checkNewId, the identifier newIdOkay you set is in the global object. So these two are not the same one. An easy fix is to move the newIdOkay in addContentItem function to the global scope.
var newIdOkay = false;
function checkNewId( size ) {
if( size == 0 ) {
console.log('found new ID!');
newIdOkay = true;
}
}
function addContentItem( store ) {
// New ID
var newId = 0;
while( newIdOkay == false && newId < 8 ) {
newId++;
store.fetch({ query: {id:newId}, onBegin: dojo.hitch(this, "checkNewId"),
start:0, count:0, sync:true });
}
}