Amazon Elastic Cloud and Silverlight Deployment - wcf

We are experimenting with hosting a silverlight application on Amazons EC2.
I can get it to serve up the .xap file, but I'm having some trouble with using the webservices that the silverlight application requires.
Usually I would add a service reference in visual studio and enter the URL for the webservice, something like http://url.com/ServiceName.svc and a proxy would be generated for me.
However with the Amazon Elastic Cloud instance entering the url
http://ec2-174-129-139-48.compute-1.amazonaws.com/AuthService.svc
Gives the error "is not recognised as a known document type"
And if I enter
http://ec2-174-129-139-48.compute-1.amazonaws.com/AuthService.svc?wsdl
Into the internet explorer address bar I get a wsdl description - but it has this part in the config which seems a bit odd
<wsdl:types>
<xsd:schema targetNamespace="http://asp.net/ApplicationServices/v200/Imports">
<xsd:import schemaLocation="http://ip-0af8db15/AuthService.svc?xsd=xsd0" namespace="http://asp.net/ApplicationServices/v200" />
<xsd:import schemaLocation="http://ip-0af8db15/AuthService.svc?xsd=xsd1" namespace="http://schemas.microsoft.com/2003/10/Serialization/" />
</xsd:schema>
</wsdl:types>
The schemaLocation http://ip-0af8db15/AuthService.svc? doesn't look like the right address to me?
Anyone know if I need to configure something or change something to access WCF webservices on Amazon EC2?
Edit: Should note : Windows Server 2003, IIS 6.0
Edit: Looks like ip-0af8db15 is the machine name

Just in case someone went into the same problem:
on proxy generation try remove the http:// at the beginning of the EC2 Address and then in the Service Config replace the part "ip-0af8db15" with the EC2 Address.
Hope it helped.

I have the same scenario deployed with no issues. Why don't you try using the IP address instead of the dynamic hostname:
http://174.129.139.48/AuthService.svc
Edit:
If an unreachable server name is being put into the VS.Net generated proxy then you can adjust it manually in the automatically generated configuration.svcinfo. Alternatively you can set the URL programatically, this is a better option since it won't get over written if you need to re-generate the proxy.
BasicHttpBinding binding = new BasicHttpBinding();
EndpointAddress address = new EndpointAddress("http://174.129.139.48/AuthService.svc");
YourProxy yourProxy = new YourProxy(binding, address);

This thread (particularly the last two posts) helped me to solve this problem.
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/wcf/thread/c7fd51a2-773e-41d4-95a0-244e925597fe/

Related

moved net.tcp WCF services from localhost to IP address on new site, services won't load

I have a website running 2 WCF services. Working awesome until I needed to move them from the "Default Web Site" in IIS7 to a dedicated website with a new IP address. Now I get the error message:
"...could not be loaded because more than one endpoint configuration for that contract was found. Please indicate the preferred endpoint configuration section by name"
ALL I did was change:
net.tcp://localhost/...
TO:
net.tcp://10.1.2.204/...
I have changed every spot in my configs which once used localhost to specified IP address. The new website is setup exactly the same with the proper net.tcp bindings and it is bound to the single IP address of 10.1.2.204.
I cannot seem to figure out what is going on. I am looking at the svc trace logs and all I get is a bunch of the same.
My new website is called "core" whereas previously I was hosting on "Default Web Site". I added a new FQDN/public IP to route to this new site (backwards to the mentioned private IP address). Now my services are busted.
I know baseAddress is ignored when using IIS/WAS hosting, so I am not sure what else to check. I changed absolutely nothing else in the configs.
What else can I provide to help troubleshoot this?
--
I am also seeing this in the service trace viewer:
Activity Name Receive bytes on connection 'Listen at 'net.tcp://hole.myserver.com/...'.'.
...but the WCF services are actually hosted on that new "core" website which translates to my new private IP address. I have change FQDN names for the example. To make it clear:
I used to have 1 FQDN on this server using Default Web Site.
I now added a 2nd FQDN to this server, new website, second IP. It seems to me that the listening should be directed towards: net.tcp://core.myserver.com instead of net.tcp://hole.myserver.com. Let's pretend the server name is hole.myserver.com and my new website is core.myserver.com on the same server.
Hopefully this is not confusing and you can make sense of it.
I'm using the default net.tcp port of 808 and binding of 808:*
--
This is the first exception thrown that I can tell:
The socket connection was aborted. This could be caused by an error processing your message or a receive timeout being exceeded by the remote host, or an underlying network resource issue. Local socket timeout was '00:00:10'.
--
None of these combos will activate the service and all produce the same exception:
net.tcp://localhost
net.tcp://localhost:808
net.tcp://10.1.2.204
net.tcp://10.1.2.204:808
even using a different port which I have done before without issue:
net.tcp://localhost:75
net.tcp://10.1.2.204:75
none of these work. :(
Thanks so much!
Its rights issue. Right click on your new website --> then Edit Permissions. On properties window click security tab and Edit button. Then Add IIS_IUSRS and give Read & Execute, List folder contents, Read permissions. Now iisreset and start to host and connect net tcp on new website.

can't enable net.tcp port sharing

I'm doing my dev work on a Window 7 x64 machine, deploying to a Windows 2008 x32 server. At the moment I'm adding WCF services to some internal apps so that we can build smaller clients using net.tcp bindings that report to the user what the server is doing without running multiple instances of the server. To cut back on how much administration the apps will require, I tried enabling port sharing on my first server app. I'm using the app to self-host the WCF service so they can be easily moved from one server to another if necessary. Here's the code starting the server:
Dim _service_host As ServiceHost
Dim active_server_address As Uri = New UriBuilder("net.tcp", "localhost", CInt(My.Settings.ServerPort)).Uri
_service_host = New ServiceHost(GetType(UpdateServiceOps), active_server_address)
_service_host.AddServiceEndpoint(GetType(IUpdateService), New NetTcpBinding With {.Name = "endpoint_tcp"}, "MiddlewareEndpoint")
_service_host.Description.Behaviors.Add(New ServiceMetadataBehavior)
_service_host.AddServiceEndpoint(GetType(IMetadataExchange), MetadataExchangeBindings.CreateMexTcpBinding, "mex")
_service_host.Open()
That works great. When I change it to what's below, however, I get an error. Here's the code:
Dim _service_host As ServiceHost
Dim active_server_address As Uri = New UriBuilder("net.tcp", "localhost", CInt(My.Settings.ServerPort)).Uri
_service_host = New ServiceHost(GetType(UpdateServiceOps), active_server_address)
_service_host.AddServiceEndpoint(GetType(IUpdateService), New NetTcpBinding With {.Name = "endpoint_tcp", .PortSharingEnabled = True}, "MiddlewareEndpoint")
_service_host.Description.Behaviors.Add(New ServiceMetadataBehavior)
_service_host.AddServiceEndpoint(GetType(IMetadataExchange), MetadataExchangeBindings.CreateMexTcpBinding, "mex")
_service_host.Open()
I get the following error when I put a breakpoint at the last line: Unable to automatically step into the server. Connecting to the server machine 'nettcpportsharing' failed. The requested name is valid, but no data of the requested type was found. The Try...Catch block housing that code says the exception type is AddressAlreadyInUseException...but when I run netstat I don't see anything else listening on that address. There's no occurrence of 'nettcpportsharing' anywhere in my solution. I've checked to make sure that the Net.Tcp Port Sharing service is started. Any ideas?
I think this may be a permissions issue. Please see the associated article which explains how to configure the port sharing service to support self-hosted services.
(For production purposes I would strongly recommend using IIS Hosting with WAS anyway - it makes management of the services much cleaner and you get dynamic startup/shutdown for free.)

WCF and IIS confusion on the wsdl location

I created my WCF project and it works fine when I just run it from the debugger.
But when I publish it to IIS and point a browser to the svc the path used has localhost in it. Like this:
htpp://localhost/MyService/MyServices.svc
but the path that the webpage says to go to for the WSDL uses my computer name, like this:
http://MyComputerName.MyDomain.net/MyService/MyService.svc?wsdl
When I click on the link it times out. (Also, trying to view the services like that in WCFTestClient times out.)
However, if I go the wsdl using localhost then it works right away:
http://lcoalhost/MyService/MyService.svc?wsdl
Any link that uses my computer name times out ("takes too long to respond").
Any idea on how to make my WCF service work with the computer name?
(NOTE: I am using Visual Studio Ultimate and IIS 7)
Try adding MyComputerName.MyDomain.net to your proxy bypass list in Internet Explorer proxy configuration setting. Check that the IIS website has this FQDN in it's hostname in the site bindings.
Also what happens if you only use MyComputerName without the domain ?

Publishing my WCF Service to my webhotel provider

I have made a small log service that i want to publish to a subdomain on my webhotel. I make the wcf service and test it locally - no problem. I then go to the [Build] menu and choose [Publish], type in my FTP location and publishes it to the location. No problems.
The problem arise when i need to use it, i try to navigate to the .svc file but gets this error:
This collection already contains an address with scheme http. There can be at most one address per scheme in this collection.
Parameter name: item
What am I doing wrong?
That's because of your IIS configuration. This has already been discussed here: WCF service startup error "This collection already contains an address with scheme http"
Solved! The problem is that i cannot access the IIS configuration, since its on a hosted environment. The solution is described on my blog, since i had so much trouble getting this to work.
http://www.vikingworks.dk/post/WCF-Service-on-hosted-environment.aspx

Silverlight WCF service acting strange

I have a silverlight project that calls into a wcf service. Everything works fine on my local machine.
However when I deploy to a virtual machine, with the exact same query the wcf service returns, but the result is empty.
I've tried debugging, but have not been able to get it to break in the wcf service.
Any ideas what the problem could be, or how I could go about debugging it?
Thanks
I figured out what the problem is, but am not sure what the solution is.
In my silverlight project the wcf service I am referencing is http://localhost/.../SilverlightApiService.svc
I used fiddler on my vm to see the request that was made and instead of trying to contact the above service, it was trying to contact:
http:///.../SilverlightApiService.svc
So, for some reason my machine name is getting inserted in there instead of localhost. Any thoughts on this would be appreciated.
I had this exact problem when deploying to amazon ec2 - The machine name for the service was being returned in the wsdl rather than the dns.
There were a couple solutions (one involved creating static wsdl - yuck!)
But the other was creating a sort of factory pattern for the service
This thread (you can read it all, but the answers are at the bottom.)
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/wcf/thread/c7fd51a2-773e-41d4-95a0-244e925597fe/
The slight downfall with this is that although it works - if you change the location of the server, you will need to remember to update your config - Which although isn't hard, it's easy to forget to do.
Can you give us a bit more information? What kind of binding are you using? What does the service config and the client config look like? Where do you get your data from that gets returned? Could it be the service on the VM just doesn't get any data? (e.g. queries a database that just doesn't have the data requested?)
Marc
I have had that happen before. I would try this. Set you start page as the web service file and run the app. Then set the start page back to your default page. Then update all the server references in your SL project. Recompile everything and republish. This has helped me a bunch of times in the past.
I figured it out.
Basically my machine name was hard coded in my ServiceReferences.ClientConfig file in my silverlight project.
What I had to do was specify programmatically what url to use for the service reference when instantiating my service client:
System.ServiceModel.EndpointAddress address = new System.ServiceModel.EndpointAddress(new Uri
(Application.Current.Host.Source, "../WebServices/SilverlightService.svc"));
ServiceClient serviceClient = new ServiceClient("BasicHttpBinding_IService", address);
I figured out what the problem is, but am not sure what the solution is.
In my silverlight project the wcf service I am referencing is http://localhost/.../SilverlightService.svc
I used fiddler on my vm to see the request that was made and instead of trying to contact the above service, it was trying to contact:
http:///.../SilverlightService.svc
So, for some reason my machine name is getting inserted in there instead of localhost. Any thoughts on this would be appreciated.