public interface FruitRepository extends CrudRepository<Article, Long> {
List<Fruit> findByTitle(String Fruit);
}
public LocalContainerEntitymanager entityManagerFactory() {
..
em.setJpaDialect(new EclipseLinkJpaDialect());
}
#Service
public class FruitService {
#Autowired
private FruitRepository fruitRepository;
#Override
public Fruit getFruitById(long fruitId) {
testFruitObj = fruitRepository.findById(fruitId).get();
testFruitObj.setFruitName("This is an apple"); --> At this point testFruitObj is saved as "This is an apple" in database.
fruitObj = fruitRepository.findById(fruitId).get();
return fruitObj;
}
}
May I check how to integrate the Eclipse JPA Dialect beginTransaction() methods so that entity can be detached?
Fruit name is change to "This is an apple" without saving. Is there any ways to overcome this?
Related
Is it possible to do something like this?
Query.cs
class Query<T> : ObjectType<MyQuery<T>> where T : class
{
protected override void configure(IObjectTypeDescriptor<MyQuery<T>> descriptor)
{
descriptor
.Field(f => f.GetItems)
.Description("Return List");
}
}
public partial class MyQuery<T> where T : class
{
private readonly IGenericRepositorty _repo
public MyQuery(IGenericRepositorty repo)
{
_repo = repo;
}
public IEnumerable<T> GetItems()
{
return _repo.GetAll(); // GetAll in generic repo
}
}
Now if I am adding my service in Startup.cs as
services.AddQueryType<MyQuery<Entity>>();
It works.
But I want to add it as
services.AddQueryType<MyQuery<>>(); or kind of services.AddQueryType(typeOf(MyQuery<>));
The way we inject generic repo like this
services.AddScoped(typef(IGenericRepository<>),typeofGenericRepository<>)
So, here at run time it creates an instance.
The same way for query at run time I am trying whether it will be possible to create instance
Is it possible to create spy(mock) object in testing class?
Here is tested class.
#Stateless
#Slf4j
public class UserDao {
#Inject
private TestBean testBean;
public String mock() {
return testBean.mock();
}
public String notMock() {
return testBean.notMock();
}
}
TestBean code
#Stateless
#Slf4j
public class TestBean {
public String notMock() {
return "NOT MOCK";
}
public String mock() {
return "IMPLEMENTED MOCK";
}
}
Here's my test
#RunWith(Arquillian.class)
public class UserDataTest {
#Rule
public ExpectedException thrown = ExpectedException.none();
#Inject
private UserDao userDao;
#Deployment
protected static Archive createWar() {
File[] dependencies = Maven.configureResolver()
.withRemoteRepo("nexus-remote", "http://maven.wideup.net/nexus/content/groups/public/", "default")
.withRemoteRepo("nexus-release", "http://maven.wideup.net/nexus/content/repositories/releases/", "default")
.resolve(
"org.slf4j:slf4j-simple:1.7.7",
"eu.bitwalker:UserAgentUtils:1.15",
"org.mockito:mockito-all:1.10.8"
).withoutTransitivity().asFile();
return ShrinkWrap
.create(WebArchive.class, "pass.jpa.war")
.addAsWebInfResource("jbossas-ds.xml")
.addAsWebInfResource("jboss-deployment-structure.xml")
.addAsLibraries(
PassApiDeployments.createDefaultDeployment(),
PassUtilLibrary.createDefaultDeployment(),
PassJpaDeployments.createDefaultDeployment()
).addAsLibraries(dependencies);
}
#Test
public void testMock() {
assertEquals("MOCK", userDao.mock());
}
#Test
public void testNotMock() {
assertEquals("NOT MOCK", userDao.notMock());
}
}
I'd like to create a spy object on TestBean to change result on method test() of this bean.
So is it possible to create TestBean spy in UserDao.
I solve some problems through producer like this.
#Singleton
public class MockFactory {
#Produces
#ArquillianAlternative
public TestBean getTestBean() {
return when(mock(TestBean.class).mock()).thenReturn("MOCK").getMock();
}
}
But in this example I need create on Bean completely on my own. And if it is bean with additional dependencies and thus i will manage all dependencies.
As far as I know, its not possible to use a mocking framework in combination with arquillian ...
I haven't used it myself, but this Arquillian extension seems to be specifically designed to support Mockito Spy objects in an Arquillian test: https://github.com/topikachu/arquillian-extension-mockito/
Hi I am trying to change a code example found here
http://imar.spaanjaars.com/577/aspnet-n-layered-applications-implementing-a-repository-using-ef-code-first-part-5
In his example he uses structure map, when I converted it to windsor I can get it to work with the one repository using the following.
container.Register(Component.For<IUnitOfWorkFactory>().ImplementedBy<EFUnitOfWorkFactory>(),
Component.For<IUnitOfWork>().ImplementedBy<EFUnitOfWork>(),
Component.For<Model.Repositories.IPeopleRepository>().ImplementedBy<PeopleRepository>().LifestyleTransient());
But what I really want to do is to map all the irepository based interfacees to thier implementation.
Here is the IRepository, T is the entity, K is the prmiary key type
public interface IRepository<T, K> where T : class
{
}
Its implementation Is
public abstract class Repository<T> : IRepository<T, int>, IDisposable where T : DomainEntity<int>
{
}
My controller has the interface IPeopleRepository as a constructor paramerter.
public interface IPeopleRepository : IRepository<Person, int>
{
}
public class PeopleRepository : Repository<Person>, IPeopleRepository
{
}
I want to have one register to register all repositories, something like this, but it wont match and i get the error Service 'Spaanjaars.ContactManager45.Model.Repositories.IPeopleRepository' which was not registered
container.Register(Component.For(typeof(IRepository<,>))
.ImplementedBy(typeof(Repository<>))
.LifestylePerWebRequest());
What am i missing in regards to this? is it because my irepository has 2 generic types?
In order to map all the IRepository based interfaces to their implementations .WithService.AllInterfaces() should be used.
This registration should solve your issue.
container.Register(
Classes.FromThisAssembly()
.BasedOn(typeof(IRepository<,>))
.WithService.AllInterfaces()
.LifestylePerWebRequest());
There are some tests to test it. I claim they are green.
[TestClass]
public class InstallerTest
{
private IWindsorContainer container;
[TestInitialize]
public void Init()
{
container = new WindsorContainer().Install(new Installer());
}
[TestMethod]
public void ResilveTest_ResolvesViaIRepository()
{
// act
var repository = container.Resolve<IRepository<Person, int>>();
// assert
repository.Should().BeOfType<PeopleRepository>();
}
[TestMethod]
public void ResilveTest_ResolvesViaIPeopleRepository()
{
// act
var repository = container.Resolve<IPeopleRepository>();
// assert
repository.Should().BeOfType<PeopleRepository>();
}
}
public class Installer : IWindsorInstaller
{
public void Install(IWindsorContainer container, IConfigurationStore store)
{
container.Register(
Classes.FromThisAssembly()
.BasedOn(typeof(IRepository<,>))
.WithService.AllInterfaces()
.LifestylePerThread());
}
}
Just wanted to know if there is a way bind a type and resolve a collection. I dont know if Ninject can do this out of the box. I'm using MVC4 with Ninject3 so I have the NinjectWebCommon.cs where I register the services. There is nowhere I can get the kernel (I read that it was bad practice to access the kernel from elsewhere, but that can certainly be the solution to this).
For example, I'm having this class:
public class CacheManager
{
public IEnumerable<SelectListItem> Get<T>() where T : INameValue
I want to be able to send
CacheManager.Get<City>
and obtain the CityRepository class.
Is it this you want to do? :
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using Ninject;
using Ninject.Modules;
using Ninject.Syntax;
public class Temp
{
public interface ICity { }
public class SelectListItem
{
}
public class FooCity : SelectListItem, ICity { }
public class BarCity : SelectListItem, ICity {}
public class CityModule : NinjectModule
{
public override void Load()
{
this.Bind<ICity>().To<FooCity>();
this.Bind<ICity>().To<BarCity>();
}
}
public class CacheManager
{
private readonly IResolutionRoot resolutionRoot;
public CacheManager(IResolutionRoot resolutionRoot)
{
this.resolutionRoot = resolutionRoot;
}
public IEnumerable<SelectListItem> Get<T>()
{
return this.resolutionRoot.GetAll<T>().OfType<SelectListItem>();
}
}
}
I'm unclear as to whether you have multiple implementations of T (ICity) or one implementation but several instances (like retrieving a list of city names from the database and creating one instance per name). The later you could solve by a this.Bind>().ToProvider(...) binding.
I ended up doing:
In NinjectWebCommon.cs:
kernel.Bind(typeof(CacheManager))
.ToSelf()
.InSingletonScope();
kernel.Bind<IDataListRepository<Locale>>()
.To<LocaleRepository>();
In CacheManager.cs:
public class CacheManager: IDisposable
{
private IKernel kernel;
public CacheManager(IKernel kernel)
{
this.kernel = kernel;
}
public IEnumerable<T> GetAsEnumerable<T>()
{
var rep = kernel.Get<IDataListRepository<T>>();
return rep.GetAll();
}
I don't know if this is bad-practice (since kernel in theory should only be used in the initialization phase), but I didn't find any other way to do it.
If better options exist, please let me know.
New poster here, hope I don't brake any rules :)
I am using PrivateModule in google-guice in order to have multiple DataSource's for the same environment. But I am having a hard time getting MethodInterceptor's to work inside the private modules.
Below is a simple test case that explains the "problem".
A simple service class would be:
interface Service {
String go();
}
class ServiceImpl implements Service {
#Override #Transactional
public String go() {
return "Test Case...";
}
}
The MyModule class would be:
class MyModule extends AbstractModule {
#Override
protected void configure() {
install(new PrivateModule() {
#Override
protected void configure() {
bind(Service.class).to(ServiceImpl.class);
bindInterceptor(
Matchers.any(),
Matchers.annotatedWith(Transactional.class),
new MethodInterceptor() {
#Override
public Object invoke(MethodInvocation i)
throws Throwable {
System.out.println("Intercepting: "
+ i.getMethod().getName());
return i.proceed();
}
});
expose(Service.class);
}
});
}
}
And the final test case:
public class TestCase {
#Inject Service service;
public TestCase() {
Guice.createInjector(new MyModule()).injectMembers(this);
}
public String go() {
return service.go();
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
TestCase t = new TestCase();
System.out.println(t.go());
}
}
You would expect the output to be:
Intercepting: go
Test Case...
But it doesn't happen, the interceptor is not used, ant only Test Case... is output.
If I bind/expose the ServiceImpl instead of the interface then it works.
Thanks in advance,
Regards,
LL
Well... I figured it out shortly after I posted the question :)
The problem is that you also need to expose() the ServiceImpl class.
So the bind/expose would be.
bind(ServiceImpl.class); // ServiceImpl annotated with #Singleton
bind(Service.class).to(ServiceImpl.class);
expose(ServiceImpl.class);
expose(Service.class);
Regards,
LL
You need to explicitly bind ServiceImpl in the private module. The problem with your existing code is that it inherits the binding for ServiceImpl from the parent module. From the PrivateModule docs,
Private modules are implemented using parent injectors. When it can satisfy their dependencies, just-in-time bindings will be created in the root environment. Such bindings are shared among all environments in the tree.
Adding this line should fix the problem:
bind(ServiceImpl.class);