There are some repositories on this page https://graphdb.sti2.at/ , how can see who have created which repository ?
Thanks
Currently there's no way to tell who created which repository. There's a way to audit the user actions, which needs to be configured - https://graphdb.ontotext.com/documentation/enterprise/security-auditing.html
Related
I ran into this situation during my training the other day.
Say im working with another guy on a terraform infrastructure, and we have shared state (ofcourse).
He creates a resource and updates the state but doesnt deploy that said resource.
After which I code an important resource and want to deploy it, but i dont want the changes the other guy made to apply along with my resource.
What would be the ideal solution for this?
Seperate workspace?
Taint his resource?
Remove his resource from the state file?
This is not possible:
"He creates a resource and updates the state but doesn't deploy that
said resource."
The state file tracks what is deployed. How would the state be updated with that resource, if the resource wasn't deployed?
What would be the ideal solution for this?
Seperate workspace?
If you are both working on resources that belong in the same environment, then that's probably not the right solution.
Taint his resource?
Tainting a resource causes an already deployed resource to be deleted and redeployed. How would that help the situation you describe?
Remove his resource from the state file?
You should never modify the state file directly.
Are you confusing the Terraform template files (.tf files) with the Terraform state file?
I'm guessing you have some terminology wrong, and what you mean to say is the resource is defined in the Terraform template, and now you need to deploy something new without including that other resource. In that case you would need to use the -target argument to deploy only certain resources.
I think in this case because there is one state file and more than one developer contributing, the use of workspaces would be best. That way both will get working sessions of the resources being deployed. Note, if you decide to go the workspace route, doing a migration of the default workspace would be needed into the new workspace. This guide can help with that.
As an open source Oozie newbie user, I found the need of improving a few line of its source code, thus I forked another Oozie repository for myself, created a branch for the fix, pushed my change to that branch, and then made a pull request for that: ( https://github.com/mapr/oozie/pull/1 )
But based on github document, a pull request should correspond to an ìssue. As the Apache (or Mapr) repository is public (https://github.com/mapr/oozie), I cannot create an issue in github. So I only created the issue in apache jira (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2646)
But in practice, my created issue in Jira and my pull request have not linked to each other at all. Anyone has suggestion on this impasse?
The github repository is just a mirror, as shown by this screenshot:
So doing a pull request won't help. The correct way to submit a code change is explained here.
Im currently working on a big project with more then one team.
Lets say in the project there are some modules that each team working on.
In addition we are using gerrit for sometime now and there is something i couldn't find out.
My question is the following:
Is there a way to tell Gerrit that only specific people/group(on Gerrit) will have permission to review code (+2) on specific path/module on the project?
This is possible, and can be achieved by using the Gerrit OWNERS Plugin. I haven't configured this plugin myself, but we use this in our codebase to protect certain areas of code.
Every folder that needs protection contains a file named OWNERS that has the following structure.
inherited: true
owners:
- user-a#example.com
- user-b#example.com
Here is the link to a readme for the plugin. Hope you can figure out how to configure it.
https://gerrit.googlesource.com/plugins/owners/+/refs/heads/master/README.md
I think you can do this by making two separate commits. You can later add the group that you want to review the code on that specific path using gerrit interface.
I wanted to know if there is a way to refresh the Pentaho Repository cache using ant. We have a build setup to pull all the new reports/jobs etc from version control and update the pentaho solution. I'm just stuck at the last step of refreshing the Solution Repository Cache so that the newly updated/added reports/jobs ect could be used.
My last option was to refresh Pentaho webapp in Tomcat but it would have been really nice to have an ant job or a http request that could be made from ant to refresh the cache.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Srijith
Look at this jira issue: http://jira.pentaho.com/browse/BISERVER-7632
You can use this url to refresh cache repository.
I'm using subversion to develop a website with a designer and I'm using a remote server to the Subversion database storage.
Now I need to make visible on the Apache(same machine that Subversion server) all the changes/commits that we make to the repository.
This is possible to do?
I have searched inside the repository files but nothing looks like the name of the files of the project(PHP Project).
Can someone give me a clue on how can I make visible the changes to the repository in a website? Is there a way to connect the changes that I do the the repository to the website?
Best Regards,
Assuming you can already browse the repository using HTTP, simply add something like Repos Style for a nice layout and folder/file history features.
You could shell out to svnadmin.