Passing commands as variables. I am creating a POP3 client and was crunching through some code when I though of something interesting.
Is it possible to pass strings of vb code to an object so that the object will execute it. I am relatively familiar with vb.net's source code being converted to Intermediate language and then being thrown into a JIT virtual machine, but I was hoping there was a simple way to implement this idea.
I want to be able to use strings
Dim Command as string
Command = "If a + b > 0 then c = a + b" '<----syntactical sugar!
System.Compiler.Something.execute(command)
If anyone has any direction, or any correction to any of the above. I appreciate your time.
Rah!
As a start you may want to check out the open source FileHelpers project.
The Runtime.ClassBuilder class in that project creates a .Net class from text, which can then be used as a normal class.
Related
There is a task to call DLL file and get output to the promptassignment variable in automation anywhere. That DLL returns the object (with student name and age). Is there any way to extract that students name and age from Promptassignmet variable without calling another DLL? Thnak you in advance.
Not in the way you would want it to work, no.
Keep in mind that AA is by no means Object oriented. Hence, the parsing of the returned object needs to be done either in the dll itself (if you have access to its source code) or by AA's Before-After String operation.
Note that the latter is only viable when the returned Student object is not hashed, e.g. "Obj#12f837g", but has a ToString() format, e.g. "{student:{name:Foo, age:12}}".
In the former approach, instead of returning the Student object, you could return student.name + ";" + student.age; for example.
If neither of the 2 options listed above are viable for you, you can try creating a metabot via the Metabot Designer in the AAE Client. You can attach the dll and check if you can call its methods individually. The goal would be to find a Getter method for both 'name' and 'age'.
If all else fails, yes, you'll need to either run another dll which would serve your purpose, or create the dll yourself (this sounds like a fairly easy dll, but I could be wrong of course).
Hopefully one of the above will help you or at least guide you on finding your own solution.
TL:DR; How can I compile a VB6 module file into a standard DLL which I can use across multiple VB6 applications?
I am tasked with the support of multiple legacy applications written in VB6.
All of these applications make use of piece of hardware constructed by my employer. Before I came on to work for my employer, he had outsourced the work of developing a DLL for the project to a company that is no longer capable of supporting it since the individual working for THEM recently quit and no one else is capable of figuring it out.
My employer has recently upgraded our hardware, so even worse - the DLL that Company furnished us with is no longer useful either.
Further exacerbated by the fact that the company who released to us the NEW hardware did not release to us a DLL file which is capable of running in VB6.
It now falls to me to create a DLL file ( NOT a device driver ) which is capable of facilitating communications between the new ( and hopefully the old ) devices and VB6 applications.
My knowledge of VB6 is... limited, at best. I am mostly familiar with .Net and have had much success in creating DLLs in .Net, but when it comes to VB6, I know enough to get by. I'm entering into uncharted territory here.
I'm well acquainted with the HID.dll and the SetupAPI.dll P/Invokes and structs necessary to make this work, and I was even fortunate enough to stumble upon this, which had a working bit of VB6 code which facilitates read/writing to/from HIDs connected to the system. I tested this and ( with a bit of fidgeting ) it worked for our device out of the box. But that doesn't help me because I can't compile the module into a DLL file ( let alone figuring out events in VB6 and a truck load of other things, but I'm getting ahead of myself ).
I've read and tried a few different methods and while they proved promising, they didn't work.
Google has also inundated me with a lot of red herrings and been in general not very helpful.
If necessary, I would even write it in C/C++ ( though I'd rather not if there is some other way ).
So is what I am trying to do possible? Can someone direct me to some step-by-step for this sort of thing?
EDIT 1 :
To expound a bit, when I say that "they didn't work", what I mean is that in the case of the first link, the program still failed to find the function ( with an error message like "Function entry point not found" ) and in the second case I consistently and repeatedly received a memory write error when trying to call the function ( not fun ).
Here's a link to a way to do a standard DLL, that looks more straightforward than the links you've posted. I can say that if Mike Strong ("strongm") posts code, it works, too. You might want to have a look at it.
However, it's probably better to use COM if you're able: it's easier to set up (obviously) and it also has some standard capabilities for keeping track of the object's interface, that are built into VB6. For example, when you use the TypeOf keyword, VB6 actually makes an internal call to the object's QueryInterface method, which is guaranteed to exist as one of the rules of COM (and, if you use the keyword on a reference to a standard DLL object you'll get an error).
VB6 does "static" classes by setting the class's Instancing property to GlobalMultiUse. Warning: the "static" keyword has an entirely different meaning in VB6: static local variables' values persist between method calls.
1. After your trip to 1998 to get your copy of VB6, start a new ActiveX DLL project:
2. Edit Project Properties for the name of the beast.
3. Add a Class for the interface you are creating. I cleverly named the class VB6Class because the project/DLL is named VB6DLL.
4. Write code. I added some test methods to perform complex calculations:
Option Explicit
Public Function GetAString(ByVal index As Integer) As String
Dim ret As String
Select Case index
Case 0
ret = "Alpha"
Case 1
ret = "Beta"
Case Else
ret = "Omega"
End Select
GetAString = ret
End Function
Public Function DoubleMyInt(ByVal value As Integer) As Integer
DoubleMyInt = (2 * value)
End Function
Public Function DoubleMyLong(ByVal value As Long) As Long
DoubleMyLong = (2 * value)
End Function
5. Make DLL from File menu. You may need to be running As Admin so it can register the DLL.
6. In the project which uses it, add a reference to the DLL.
Test code:
Private Sub Command1_Click()
Dim vb6 As New VB6DLL.VB6Class
Dim var0 As String
Dim var1 As Integer
Dim var2 As Long
var0 = vb6.GetAString(0)
var1 = vb6.DoubleMyInt(2)
var2 = vb6.DoubleMyLong(1234)
Debug.Print "GetAString == " & var0
Debug.Print "DoubleMyInt == " & var1
Debug.Print "DoubleMyLng == " & var2
End Sub
Result:
GetAString == Alpha
DoubleMyInt == 4
DoubleMyLng == 2468
Not sure what to do about the "truck load of other things".
So I'm writing a standalone JScript file to be executed by Windows Script Host (this file is not going to be used as a web application).
My goal is to load a dll file. Just like using LoadLibrary function in a C++ application.
I tried researching the subject but I didn't come up with anything useful. I'm so lost I don't have any piece of code to share. I understand using ActiveXObject may come to my rescue. if so, any idea how to use it?
Update:
If we all agree that loading is impossible, I'll settle for validity check. Meaning, don't try to load but check if it is loaded and functional.
You can export a specific function for this purpose.
Then, from your JScript, execute rundll32.exe and check that the function ran as expected.
You might also give Gilles Laurent's DynaWrap
ocx a chance.
This kind of dll needs to be registered on the target system like regsvr32 /s DynaWrap.dll.
It is restricted to 32-bit DLLs, and this might be inconvenient for you to use, but it works on a 64bit Windows. You can't access function exported by ordinal number and you can't directly handle 64bit or greater values/pointers.
Here's a sample to call MessageBoxA from JScript:
var oDynaWrap = new ActiveXObject( "DynamicWrapper" )
// to call MessageBoxA(), first register the API function
oDynaWrap.Register( "USER32.DLL", "MessageBoxA", "I=HsSu", "f=s", "R=l" )
// now call the function
oDynaWrap.MessageBoxA( null, "MessageBoxA()", "A messagebox from JScript...", 3 )
And here from VBScript:
Option Explicit
Dim oDynaWrap
Set oDynaWrap = CreateObject( "DynamicWrapper" )
' to call MessageBoxA(), first register the API function
UserWrap.Register "USER32.DLL", "MessageBoxA", "I=HsSu", "f=s", "R=l"
' now call the function
UserWrap.MessageBoxA Null, "MessageBoxA()", "A messagebox from VBScript...", 3
To use a function you need to "register" the exported function of your DLL.
To do this you need to call the register method with a first parameter containing a string object to the complete path of the DLL, a second parameter for the exported name of the function to use, and following three paremeters describing the functions declartion in a somehow obscure syntax.
i= describes the number and data type of the functions parameters.
f= describes the type of call: _stdcall or _cdecl. Default to _stdcall.
r= describes the return values data type.
The supported data types are:
Code Variant Description
a VT_DISPATCH IDispatch*
b VT_BOOL BOOL
c VT_I4 unsigned char
d VT_R8 8 byte real
f VT_R4 4 byte real
h VT_I4 HANDLE
k VT_UNKNOWN IUnknown*
l VT_I4 LONG
p VT_PTR pointer
r VT_LPSTR string by reference
s VT_LPSTR string
t VT_I2 SHORT
u VT_UINT UINT
w VT_LPWSTR wide string
Thus the Register method call used in the examples describes MessageBoxA like this:
_stdcall LONG MessageBoxA( HANDLE, LPSTR, LPSTR, UINT );
For a explanation of MessageBoxA look at the docs on MSDN.
Please read the DynaWrap docs for more sophisticated examples... But you might need Google translate, 'cos they are written in french ;-)
To be able to use a dll as ActiveXObject, it needs to be registered as COM object. There are some restrictions on this but if you have a code for this dll, it is certainly doable.
When you register your dll as COM object, it is assigned a name. You use this name to create an object. This example from MSDN uses excel since it is already registered if you installed office.
var ExcelApp = new ActiveXObject("Excel.Application");
var ExcelSheet = new ActiveXObject("Excel.Sheet");
// Make Excel visible through the Application object.
ExcelSheet.Application.Visible = true;
// Place some text in the first cell of the sheet.
ExcelSheet.ActiveSheet.Cells(1,1).Value = "This is column A, row 1";
// Save the sheet.
ExcelSheet.SaveAs("C:\\TEST.XLS");
// Close Excel with the Quit method on the Application object.
ExcelSheet.Application.Quit();
Apart from restriction of registering dll, using dll is no different from using it as c++ or c# dll. Note that, C# (or other .NET dlls) should be ComVisible to be used from javascript this way.
EDIT: The only other way of using C/C++ dll from javascript is swig interfaces. I have not used it, therefore I can only point you in that direction.
SWIG is a software development tool that connects programs written in
C and C++ with a variety of high-level programming languages. SWIG is
used with different types of target languages including common
scripting languages such as Javascript, Perl, PHP, Python, Tcl and
Ruby.
I'm a C++ programming who was tapped to write a small application in Visual Basic. The application hosts an IronPython runtime and I am attempting to define some function in python and then call them from VB. I have written a simple test function in python
def test():
print "Test was Called"
Then I use the iron python to create a ScriptSource from the python file. I am able to look up the "test" variable through object operations but I can not figure out how to call the object that. For example (in VB):
pyScope = engine.CreateScope()
pySource = engine.CreateSourceFromFile("C:\Some\File\path\test.py")
pySource.Execute(pyScope)
' Now I expect the function test() to be defined in pyScope
Dim tmp as Object
pyScope.TryGetVariable("test", tmp)
At this point in my code tmp is defined as an object of type PythonFunction. I can't figure out how to call this function.
tmp()
Is not valid VB syntax. I've gotten this far, now how do I perform this seemingly simple task?
Edit: By calling
pyEngine.Operations.Invoke(tmp)
I am able to call the function and I see the expected output at stdout. I am still under the impression that there is some function-pointer-like type that I can cast objects of type PythonFunction to which will let me invoke temp directly without calling to the Python engine.
Not sure this will work, but try casting it to an Action type:
DirectCast(tmp, Action)()
Based on the comment, try this:
engine.ObjectOperations.Invoke(tmp, Nothing)
VB in .NET 4 should have the same dynamic support as C#. According to http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee461504.aspx#Y5108 (near the bottom), you should be able to do:
Dim tmp As Object = scope.GetVariable("test")
... which is what you're already doing, so make sure you're targeting .NET 4.
If that doesn't work you should be able to cast it with the generic version of GetVariable:
Dim tmp As Action = scope.GetVariable(Of Action)("test")
Finally, you already discovered Invoke on ObjectOperations.
(You may need to tweak the syntax, since I don't know VB.)
I'm trying to store the names of some variables inside strings. For example:
Dim Foo1 as Integer
Dim Foo1Name as String
' -- Do something to set Foo1Name to the name of the other variable --
MessageBox.Show(Foo1Name & " is the variable you are looking for.")
' Outputs:
' Foo1 is the variable you are looking for.
This would help with some debugging I'm working on.
Well, you can clearly just set Foo1Name = "Foo1" - but I strongly suspect that's not what you're after.
How would you know which variable you're trying to find the name of? What's the bigger picture? What you want may be possible with reflection, if we're talking about non-local variables, but I suspect it's either not feasible, or there's a better way to attack the problem in the first place.
Does this example from msdn using reflection help?
One solution would be to use an associative array to store your variables. Once, I did this in .Net, but I think I wrote a custom class to do it.
myArray("foo1Name") = "foo1"
Then, you can just store a list of your variable names, or you can wrap that up in the same class.
if( myArray(variableName(x)) == whatImLookingFor ) print variableName(x) & "is it"
I think this really depends on what you are trying to debug. Two possible things to look at are the Reflection and StackTrace classes. That said when your program is compiled, the compiler and runtime do not guarantee that that names need to be consistent with the original program.
This is especially the case with debug vs. release builds. The point of the .PDB files (symbols) in the debug version are to include more information about the original program. For native C/C++ applications it is strongly recommended that you generate symbols for every build (debug+release) of your application to help with debugging. In .NET this is less of an issue since there are features like Reflection. IIRC John Robbins recommends that you always generate symbols for .NET projects too.
You might also find Mike Stall's blog useful and the managed debugger samples.
For finding the variable name, see: Finding the variable name passed to a function
This would apply to VB.Net as well.